Inspector of Police Vellakovil Police Station vs Rakki Advocate - Kalaichezhiyan B — 145/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNTI030007762021
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
36/2021
Filing Date
29-10-2021
Registration No
145/2021
Registration Date
29-10-2021
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court, Dharapuram
Judge
1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
209
Police Station
Vellakovil Police Station
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police Vellakovil Police Station
Adv. Manivannan M
Respondent(s)
Rakki Advocate - Kalaichezhiyan B
Hearing History
Judge: 1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge
Issue of Service
Service Pending
Await Records
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 23-03-2026 | Service Pending | |
| 09-03-2026 | Await Records | |
| 03-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY This is a witness deposition (P.W.20) in Case No. 145/2021 before the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dharapuram, dated 02-04-2026. The witness, a police officer, testified regarding a complaint (Petition No. 126/2017) involving a domestic dispute between two parties, wherein both parties (Sivanmathi and Rocky) acknowledged their relationship and subsequently provided written undertakings to cease contact and maintain peaceful coexistence with their respective spouses. During cross-examination, the witness's credibility was challenged on procedural irregularities, including date discrepancies in filing the complaint and the lack of contemporaneous investigation, ultimately resulting in the testimony being recorded with reservations about its reliability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY This is a witness deposition (P.W.20) in Case No. 145/2021 before the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dharapuram, dated 02-04-2026. The witness, a police officer, testified regarding a complaint (Petition No. 126/2017) involving a domestic dispute between two parties, wherein both parties (Sivanmathi and Rocky) acknowledged their relationship and subsequently provided written undertakings to cease contact and maintain peaceful coexistence with their respective spouses. During cross-examination, the witness's credibility was challenged on procedural irregularities, including date discrepancies in filing the complaint and the lack of contemporaneous investigation, ultimately resulting in the testimony being recorded with reservations about its reliability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts