Inspector of Police, Kangayam Police Station, Tiruppur vs Nataraj — 244/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,201,120B,342,34. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNTI030007102023
Filing Number
71/2023
Filing Date
08-Sep-2023
Registration No
244/2023
Registration Date
08-Sep-2023
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court, Dharapuram
Judge
1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
177
Police Station
Kangayam Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police, Kangayam Police Station, Tiruppur
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nataraj
-
2.Saravanan
Case History
-
02-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Apr-2026
Trial
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Trial
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Service Pending
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Await Reports
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
Await Reports
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
Await Reports
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Await Reports
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Aug-2025
Await Reports
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Jul-2025
Await Reports
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Jun-2025
Await Reports
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Apr-2025
Await Reports
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2025
Await Reports
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Feb-2025
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
Summary: The petition filed under Section 91 of the Criminal Procedure Code by accused Natraj and Saravanan seeking call records from Bharti Airtel Limited for two mobile numbers (9003949765 and 8760111000) for the period 20.04.2023 to 24.06.2023 has been allowed. The court found that the accused should be given sufficient opportunity to set up their defense and that merely obtaining the documents for court inspection would not reveal investigative secrets, thus permitting the investigation officer to submit the collected information to the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Feb-2025
Issue of Service
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Jan-2025
Orders
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Dec-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Nov-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Nov-2024
Trial
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Oct-2024
Trial
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Sep-2024
Trial
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Aug-2024
Trial
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Aug-2024
Trial
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Aug-2024
Trial
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Jul-2024
Trial
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Jul-2024
Trial
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Jun-2024
Trial
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Apr-2024
Trial
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Mar-2024
Trial
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2024
Framing of Charges
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Jan-2024
For further Proceedings
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Dec-2023
For further Proceedings
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Oct-2023
Appearance
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Sep-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 244/2023
Summary: The petition filed under Section 91 of the Criminal Procedure Code by accused Natraj and Saravanan seeking call records from Bharti Airtel Limited for two mobile numbers (9003949765 and 8760111000) for the period 20.04.2023 to 24.06.2023 has been allowed. The court found that the accused should be given sufficient opportunity to set up their defense and that merely obtaining the documents for court inspection would not reveal investigative secrets, thus permitting the investigation officer to submit the collected information to the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts