VKS AGRO HI TECH RICE INDUSTRIES REP BY MANAGING PARTNER RAJESHWARI vs SRI ATHANOOR AMMAN TRADERS REP BY PROPRIETOR KRISHNAMOORTHY — 150/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 09th March 2026.
CRLA - Criminal Appeal
CNR: TNTI030007092022
Filing Number
141/2022
Filing Date
27-Oct-2022
Registration No
150/2022
Registration Date
27-Oct-2022
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court, Dharapuram
Judge
1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VKS AGRO HI TECH RICE INDUSTRIES REP BY MANAGING PARTNER RAJESHWARI
Adv. Padma M
-
2.Rajeshwari
Respondent(s)
-
1.SRI ATHANOOR AMMAN TRADERS REP BY PROPRIETOR KRISHNAMOORTHY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The appellate court dismissed the criminal appeal and upheld the trial court's conviction of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act for issuing a cheque worth Rs. 12,71,317 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found that the signature on the cheque belonged to the second accused (a partner in the business), that a legally enforceable debt existed between the parties from their paddy business transaction evidenced by bank transfers of Rs. 40,00,000, and that the cheque was issued to discharge this debt. The second accused was sentenced to six months simple imprisonment with an additional one-month sentence if compensation payment failed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Judgement
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Nov-2025
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Aug-2025
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Jul-2025
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Jun-2025
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Apr-2025
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Apr-2025
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2025
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Jan-2025
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Dec-2024
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Nov-2024
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Oct-2024
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Sep-2024
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Aug-2024
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Jun-2024
Appearance
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2024
Appearance
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
31-Jan-2024
Appearance
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Dec-2023
Appearance
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Nov-2023
Issue of Service
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Sep-2023
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Jul-2023
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Jun-2023
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Apr-2023
Issues
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Mar-2023
Arguments
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2023
Await Records
III Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Oct-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 150/2022
The appellate court dismissed the criminal appeal and upheld the trial court's conviction of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act for issuing a cheque worth Rs. 12,71,317 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found that the signature on the cheque belonged to the second accused (a partner in the business), that a legally enforceable debt existed between the parties from their paddy business transaction evidenced by bank transfers of Rs. 40,00,000, and that the cheque was issued to discharge this debt. The second accused was sentenced to six months simple imprisonment with an additional one-month sentence if compensation payment failed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts