VKS AGRO HI TECH RICE INDUSTRIES REP BY MANAGING PARTNER RAJESHWARI vs SRI ATHANOOR AMMAN TRADERS REP BY PROPRIETOR KRISHNAMOORTHY — 150/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 09th March 2026.
CRLA - Criminal Appeal
CNR: TNTI030007092022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
141/2022
Filing Date
27-10-2022
Registration No
150/2022
Registration Date
27-10-2022
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court, Dharapuram
Judge
1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VKS AGRO HI TECH RICE INDUSTRIES REP BY MANAGING PARTNER RAJESHWARI
Adv. Padma M
Rajeshwari
Respondent(s)
SRI ATHANOOR AMMAN TRADERS REP BY PROPRIETOR KRISHNAMOORTHY
Hearing History
Judge: 1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-02-2026 | Judgement | |
| 02-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 19-12-2025 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The appellate court dismissed the criminal appeal and upheld the trial court's conviction of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act for issuing a cheque worth Rs. 12,71,317 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found that the signature on the cheque belonged to the second accused (a partner in the business), that a legally enforceable debt existed between the parties from their paddy business transaction evidenced by bank transfers of Rs. 40,00,000, and that the cheque was issued to discharge this debt. The second accused was sentenced to six months simple imprisonment with an additional one-month sentence if compensation payment failed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The appellate court dismissed the criminal appeal and upheld the trial court's conviction of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act for issuing a cheque worth Rs. 12,71,317 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found that the signature on the cheque belonged to the second accused (a partner in the business), that a legally enforceable debt existed between the parties from their paddy business transaction evidenced by bank transfers of Rs. 40,00,000, and that the cheque was issued to discharge this debt. The second accused was sentenced to six months simple imprisonment with an additional one-month sentence if compensation payment failed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts