Radha @ Nallathal vs Vjayaragavan — 708/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(d),37(2). Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI030006842023
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1762/2023
Filing Date
12-09-2023
Registration No
708/2023
Registration Date
12-09-2023
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court, Dharapuram
Judge
1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Radha @ Nallathal
Adv. Jayabalan C
Respondent(s)
Vjayaragavan
Vasantha Mani
Naveen Prasath
Hearing History
Judge: 1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 03-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a civil court order from the Additional District and Sessions Court No. 3, Tharamapuram (Case No. 708/2023), dated February 13, 2026, regarding a property partition dispute. The court examined witness testimony regarding disputed agricultural land (Survey No. 646) and rejected several key claims made by the plaintiff's witness, finding that the plaintiff was excluded from a 1985 partition without proper justification and that subsequent settlement documents executed without the plaintiff's inclusion are invalid. The case involves competing claims over jointly-held property rights and inheritance matters among family members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a civil court order from the Additional District and Sessions Court No. 3, Tharamapuram (Case No. 708/2023), dated February 13, 2026, regarding a property partition dispute. The court examined witness testimony regarding disputed agricultural land (Survey No. 646) and rejected several key claims made by the plaintiff's witness, finding that the plaintiff was excluded from a 1985 partition without proper justification and that subsequent settlement documents executed without the plaintiff's inclusion are invalid. The case involves competing claims over jointly-held property rights and inheritance matters among family members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts