Nithyachandika vs N. Balasubramaniam — 511/2021

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 37(2). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI030006552021

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

5049/2021

Filing Date

29-09-2021

Registration No

511/2021

Registration Date

29-09-2021

Court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Dharapuram

Judge

1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 37(2)

Petitioner(s)

Nithyachandika

Adv. Iswaramoorthy C

Respondent(s)

N. Balasubramaniam

Vimaladevi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge

17-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

07-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

30-03-2026

Orders

09-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

17-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

20-02-2023
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The petition for temporary injunction under CPC Order 39 Rules 1-2 was partly allowed. The court granted ad-interim injunction requiring both parties to maintain status quo regarding disputed joint family properties in Ponnapuram village until final disposal of the partition suit, finding the plaintiff established a prima facie case and balance of convenience favored her. No costs were awarded, and both parties were directed to cooperate for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition for temporary injunction under CPC Order 39 Rules 1-2 was partly allowed. The court granted ad-interim injunction requiring both parties to maintain status quo regarding disputed joint family properties in Ponnapuram village until final disposal of the partition suit, finding the plaintiff established a prima facie case and balance of convenience favored her. No costs were awarded, and both parties were directed to cooperate for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Dharapuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case