R.Krishnamurthy vs K.S.N. Venugopalu and 3 others — 514/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 42,22. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI030006512021
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
5047/2021
Filing Date
29-09-2021
Registration No
514/2021
Registration Date
29-09-2021
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court, Dharapuram
Judge
1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R.Krishnamurthy
Adv. Satishkumar N
Respondent(s)
K.S.N. Venugopalu and 3 others
Thenmozhi KV
Vishnu Chandiran KV
Swathi KV
Hearing History
Judge: 1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge
Arguments
Arguments
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 17-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 10-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: A.V. 514/2021 Court: Additional District and Sessions Court No. 3, Dharapuram Date: February 27, 2026 Outcome: Witness examination completed. The witness (Periyasamy, age 65, employed in private job) was recalled, re-sworn, and cross-examined by the defendants' counsel regarding defendants 1-4's management of educational institutions, their administrative capabilities, land holdings, and the witness's involvement in related documentation and transactions. The cross-examination covered contradictions in the witness's earlier statements and his relationship with the defendants. The court recorded the witness testimony as read and authenticated before the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: A.V. 514/2021 Court: Additional District and Sessions Court No. 3, Dharapuram Date: February 27, 2026 Outcome: Witness examination completed. The witness (Periyasamy, age 65, employed in private job) was recalled, re-sworn, and cross-examined by the defendants' counsel regarding defendants 1-4's management of educational institutions, their administrative capabilities, land holdings, and the witness's involvement in related documentation and transactions. The cross-examination covered contradictions in the witness's earlier statements and his relationship with the defendants. The court recorded the witness testimony as read and authenticated before the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts