Jeyalakshmi vs Kabilan — 114/2020
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section sec 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTI030005432020
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
330/2020
Filing Date
24-11-2020
Registration No
114/2020
Registration Date
24-11-2020
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court, Dharapuram
Judge
1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jeyalakshmi
Adv. Thennarasu K
Minor Swetha
Adv. Thennarasu K
Minor Vishunu Prasanth
Adv. Thennarasu K
Rathinam
Adv. Thennarasu K
Respondent(s)
Kabilan
Arunkumar
Adv. Viswanathan M
United India Insurance
Adv. Govi Elanchezian G
Hearing History
Judge: 1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-01-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 17-12-2025 | Issue of Service |
Interim Orders
This is a motor vehicle accident compensation case (MCOP No. 114/2020) from the Additional District and Sessions Court in Tarapuram dated 12-02-2026. The court examined a police investigation into a two-wheeler accident from 27.06.2020 where the deceased Ramamurthy was initially blamed but investigation revealed he was actually responsible for causing the accident due to negligence, not the truck driver. The case record was closed with "Charge abated" after the accused officer's final report was filed, and the court admitted the witness testimony regarding the investigation findings and examination of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a motor vehicle accident compensation case (MCOP No. 114/2020) from the Additional District and Sessions Court in Tarapuram dated 12-02-2026. The court examined a police investigation into a two-wheeler accident from 27.06.2020 where the deceased Ramamurthy was initially blamed but investigation revealed he was actually responsible for causing the accident due to negligence, not the truck driver. The case record was closed with "Charge abated" after the accused officer's final report was filed, and the court admitted the witness testimony regarding the investigation findings and examination of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts