Lakshminathan vs S.Vengadachalam — 401/2022

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 40,27(c). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI030004472022

Arguments

Next Hearing

27th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

270/2022

Filing Date

17-06-2022

Registration No

401/2022

Registration Date

17-06-2022

Court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Dharapuram

Judge

1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 40,27(c)
IA/3/2025 Classification : Adjournment Petition Section LakshminathanS.Vengadachalam
IA/4/2025 Classification : Adjournment Petition Section LakshminathanS.Vengadachalam

Petitioner(s)

Lakshminathan

Adv. Baranikumar B

Respondent(s)

S.Vengadachalam

Hearing History

Judge: 1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge

15-04-2026

Arguments

07-04-2026

Arguments

24-03-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Evidence

09-03-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

16-03-2026
Copy of Deposition / Witness

Summary: This is a witness examination order (not a final judgment) in Civil Case No. 401/2022 before the Additional District and Sessions Court, Tarapur, dated March 16, 2026. The witness Muhammad Ali Jinna (a scrap iron trader, age 59, from Krishnarayapuram) was examined regarding a monetary dispute case where the plaintiff claims the defendant failed to repay borrowed money. The court recorded the witness's testimony, which was transcribed, read over to the witness, and signed by both the witness and the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a witness examination order (not a final judgment) in Civil Case No. 401/2022 before the Additional District and Sessions Court, Tarapur, dated March 16, 2026. The witness Muhammad Ali Jinna (a scrap iron trader, age 59, from Krishnarayapuram) was examined regarding a monetary dispute case where the plaintiff claims the defendant failed to repay borrowed money. The court recorded the witness's testimony, which was transcribed, read over to the witness, and signed by both the witness and the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Dharapuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case