Sagul Hameed vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur KANGEYAM PS — 120/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(3). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
CRLA - Criminal Appeal
CNR: TNTI030004432025
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
45/2025
Filing Date
24-04-2025
Registration No
120/2025
Registration Date
19-07-2025
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court, Dharapuram
Judge
1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
86
Police Station
Kangayam Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sagul Hameed
Muhammed Sadik Batsha aliash Sathik ali
Respondent(s)
State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur KANGEYAM PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 16-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 08-12-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition for suspension of sentence under Section 430(1) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 is allowed. Two accused (Sagulhammeed and Mohamed Sathik Batcha) convicted of offenses under IPC Section 295 and TNPPDL Act Section 3(1) with sentences of 2-5 years imprisonment are granted bail with sentence suspended pending appeal disposal. Conditions include executing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, attending all appellate court hearings, and cooperating for early appeal disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition for suspension of sentence under Section 430(1) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 is allowed. Two accused (Sagulhammeed and Mohamed Sathik Batcha) convicted of offenses under IPC Section 295 and TNPPDL Act Section 3(1) with sentences of 2-5 years imprisonment are granted bail with sentence suspended pending appeal disposal. Conditions include executing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, attending all appellate court hearings, and cooperating for early appeal disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts