Kalimuthu vs Arockiyaraj and 2 others — 248/2017
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Additional Counter. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTI030002282017
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
248/2017
Filing Date
07-04-2017
Registration No
248/2017
Registration Date
19-04-2017
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court, Dharapuram
Judge
1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kalimuthu
Adv. Sekar S T
Kalaivani
Loganathan
Respondent(s)
Arockiyaraj and 2 others
Arockiyaraj
The New India Assurance Company ltd
Hearing History
Judge: 1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge
Additional Counter
For further Proceedings
Steps
For further Proceedings
Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Additional Counter | |
| 02-04-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 09-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 25-02-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 12-02-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Summary In this cross-examination order (Case No. MCOP No.248/2017, dated 13.04.2023), the court examined facts in a vehicle accident case where the driver, allegedly intoxicated, caused a truck to overturn, resulting in one death and two injuries. The court found the third accused/respondent responsible for the accident as the primary cause was the driver's alcohol consumption while operating the vehicle. The court upheld that the third accused cannot evade responsibility for the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In this cross-examination order (Case No. MCOP No.248/2017, dated 13.04.2023), the court examined facts in a vehicle accident case where the driver, allegedly intoxicated, caused a truck to overturn, resulting in one death and two injuries. The court found the third accused/respondent responsible for the accident as the primary cause was the driver's alcohol consumption while operating the vehicle. The court upheld that the third accused cannot evade responsibility for the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts