Union Bank of India vs Devathi — 16/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 22,33. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Mediation on 09th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI030000052025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
5/2025
Filing Date
23-09-2024
Registration No
16/2025
Registration Date
07-01-2025
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court, Dharapuram
Judge
1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled through Mediation
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Union Bank of India
Respondent(s)
Devathi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Mediation
Mediation
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-02-2026 | Mediation | |
| 06-02-2026 | Mediation | |
| 06-01-2026 | Trial | |
| 26-11-2025 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Sub Mediation Centre, Dharapuram submitted a mediation report dated 17.2.2026 for three cases (OS 16/2025, CRLA 169/2025, and OS 770/2025) referred to mediation. One case (OS 16/2025) involving a dispute between a Union Bank branch manager and respondent S. Doyarshi was successfully settled through mediation on 13.2.2026, with the defendant agreeing to pay Rs. 600,000 (six lakh only) to the plaintiff in full satisfaction. The settlement agreement was executed voluntarily by both parties, and the cases were forwarded to the III Additional District Judge for further proceedings and final orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Sub Mediation Centre, Dharapuram submitted a mediation report dated 17.2.2026 for three cases (OS 16/2025, CRLA 169/2025, and OS 770/2025) referred to mediation. One case (OS 16/2025) involving a dispute between a Union Bank branch manager and respondent S. Doyarshi was successfully settled through mediation on 13.2.2026, with the defendant agreeing to pay Rs. 600,000 (six lakh only) to the plaintiff in full satisfaction. The settlement agreement was executed voluntarily by both parties, and the cases were forwarded to the III Additional District Judge for further proceedings and final orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts