Chellamuthu N vs Subramaniam C — 2/2022

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 22. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI030000042022

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

27th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

4/2022

Filing Date

05-01-2022

Registration No

2/2022

Registration Date

05-01-2022

Court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Dharapuram

Judge

1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 22

Petitioner(s)

Chellamuthu N

Adv. Palanisamy S

Respondent(s)

Subramaniam C

Hearing History

Judge: 1-III Additional District and Sessions Judge

08-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

09-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

25-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

03-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

12-01-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

11-06-2024
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The court allowed the petition (IA.2/2023 in OS.2/2022) filed before the Third Additional District and Sessions Court, Tharapuram on 11.06.2024. The petition sought to add respondents 2-4 (the legal heirs of the deceased first respondent who died on 22.11.2022) to the original suit OS.2/2022, as they are now liable for the promissory note debt. The court found merit in the petitioner's arguments and permitted the substitution of parties accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the petition (IA.2/2023 in OS.2/2022) filed before the Third Additional District and Sessions Court, Tharapuram on 11.06.2024. The petition sought to add respondents 2-4 (the legal heirs of the deceased first respondent who died on 22.11.2022) to the original suit OS.2/2022, as they are now liable for the promissory note debt. The court found merit in the petitioner's arguments and permitted the substitution of parties accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Dharapuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case