Subburam vs Inspector of Police, Theni P.S — 7451/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 339(2). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTH020094672024

Filing Number

9327/2024

Filing Date

18-Oct-2024

Registration No

7451/2024

Registration Date

18-Oct-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Theni

Judge

5-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

880

Police Station

Theni P.S.

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 339(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Subburam

    Adv. Murugaraj.R.K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Theni P.S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Subburam v. Inspector of Police, Theni P.S (Crl.M.P. 7451/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed Subburam's petition seeking permission for his private counsel to assist the Assistant Public Prosecutor during trial of Crime No. 880/2018. The court found no merit in the petition because Subburam provided no justification for private counsel assistance, the Public Prosecutor had conducted prosecution diligently with all witnesses properly examined, and the petition was filed belatedly after prosecution evidence concluded on 16.10.2024, contravening High Court directions to expedite case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 06-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  10. 26-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  11. 15-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  12. 27-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  13. 12-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  14. 08-Oct-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  15. 18-Sep-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  16. 22-Aug-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  17. 13-Aug-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  18. 25-Jul-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  19. 14-Jul-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  20. 07-Jul-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  21. 25-Jun-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  22. 12-Jun-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  23. 03-Jun-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  24. 20-May-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  25. 29-Apr-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  26. 22-Apr-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  27. 05-Apr-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  28. 26-Mar-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  29. 17-Mar-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  30. 27-Feb-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  31. 03-Feb-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  32. 10-Jan-2025

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  33. 19-Dec-2024

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  34. 25-Nov-2024

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate

  35. 19-Nov-2024

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate

  36. 16-Nov-2024

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate

  37. 12-Nov-2024

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate

  38. 21-Oct-2024

    Counter

    Judicial Magistrate

  39. 18-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 18-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7451/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Subburam v. Inspector of Police, Theni P.S (Crl.M.P. 7451/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed Subburam's petition seeking permission for his private counsel to assist the Assistant Public Prosecutor during trial of Crime No. 880/2018. The court found no merit in the petition because Subburam provided no justification for private counsel assistance, the Public Prosecutor had conducted prosecution diligently with all witnesses properly examined, and the petition was filed belatedly after prosecution evidence concluded on 16.10.2024, contravening High Court directions to expedite case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case