Inspector of Police, Theni P.S vs Veerasureshsingh — 12/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 174,306. Status: Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
PRC - Preliminary Register Case
CNR: TNTH020064832019
Filing Number
6304/2019
Filing Date
21-Aug-2019
Registration No
12/2019
Registration Date
22-Aug-2019
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Theni
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
723
Police Station
Theni P.S.
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police, Theni P.S
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Veerasureshsingh
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Apr-2026
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2026
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Feb-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: PRC No. 12/2019 The court ordered the surety (Murugan) to pay Rs. 5,000 to forfeit the bail bond, with a default penalty of 15 days civil imprisonment. The surety failed to produce the accused Veerasureshsingh before the court despite being granted sufficient time and having executed a bond for Rs. 10,000, and provided no adequate explanation for the non-production. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Feb-2026
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jan-2026
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Dec-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Oct-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Sep-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jun-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-May-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Apr-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Feb-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Nov-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Aug-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jun-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-May-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Feb-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jan-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Nov-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Sep-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jul-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-May-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-May-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Mar-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Dec-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Nov-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Sep-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Aug-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Jun-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Apr-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jan-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Nov-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Sep-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jun-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Apr-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Mar-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jan-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jan-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jan-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Jan-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Dec-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Aug-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-May-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Apr-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jan-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Nov-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Aug-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 12/2019
Case Summary: PRC No. 12/2019 The court ordered the surety (Murugan) to pay Rs. 5,000 to forfeit the bail bond, with a default penalty of 15 days civil imprisonment. The surety failed to produce the accused Veerasureshsingh before the court despite being granted sufficient time and having executed a bond for Rs. 10,000, and provided no adequate explanation for the non-production. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts