M. Manivannan vs K. Muthamilselvi and another — 163/2019

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,141,142,163A,163B,166,183A. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 09-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTH020041562023

Filing Number

12001/2019

Filing Date

14-Jun-2019

Registration No

163/2019

Registration Date

14-Jun-2019

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Theni

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,141,142,163A,163B,166,183A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M. Manivannan

    Adv. Sureshkumar.P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K. Muthamilselvi and another

  2. 2.The branch Manager, Iffco Tokio Gen Ins Co Ltd, Theni

    Adv. Venkateswaran.S

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 06-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 16-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 24-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 11-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 04-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 07-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 13-Sep-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 08-Sep-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 04-Sep-2025

    Steps

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 26-Aug-2025

    Steps

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 05-Aug-2025

    Steps

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 15-Jul-2025

    Steps

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 17-Jun-2025

    Steps

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 29-Apr-2025

    Steps

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 08-Apr-2025

    Steps

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 11-Mar-2025

    Steps

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 03-Mar-2025

    Steps

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 24-Feb-2025

    Steps

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 11-Feb-2025

    Steps

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 03-Feb-2025

    Steps

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 27-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 21-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 07-Jan-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This document is a witness deposition record, not a court order with a case outcome. It records the testimony of PW-2 (a medical witness) in MCOP 163/2019 on 07-01-2025. The witness testified that petitioner M. Manivannan, age 29, was assessed with 53% disability following an accident, with 43% neurological impairment and additional eye and organ-related disabilities certified in May 2024. The deposition was completed at 12:18 PM after cross-examination by the respondent's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  32. 07-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 09-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  34. 25-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  35. 12-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  36. 06-Nov-2024

    For further Proceedings

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  37. 05-Nov-2024

    IA Pending

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  38. 28-Oct-2024

    IA Pending

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  39. 21-Oct-2024

    IA Pending

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  40. 07-Oct-2024

    IA Pending

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  41. 01-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  42. 21-Sep-2024

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  43. 17-Sep-2024

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  44. 10-Sep-2024

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  45. 20-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  46. 07-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  47. 03-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  48. 22-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  49. 16-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  50. 02-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  51. 20-May-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  52. 06-May-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  53. 06-May-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  54. 08-Apr-2024

    Trial

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  55. 25-Mar-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  56. 25-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  57. 26-Feb-2024

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  58. 20-Feb-2024

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  59. 29-Jan-2024

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  60. 28-Nov-2023

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  61. 16-Oct-2023

    Publication

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  62. 04-Sep-2023

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  63. 18-Jul-2023

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  64. 20-Jun-2023

    Service Pending-Notice

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  65. 05-Apr-2023

    Service Pending-Notice

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  66. 24-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  67. 14-Jun-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 163/2019

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness deposition record, not a court order with a case outcome. It records the testimony of PW-2 (a medical witness) in MCOP 163/2019 on 07-01-2025. The witness testified that petitioner M. Manivannan, age 29, was assessed with 53% disability following an accident, with 43% neurological impairment and additional eye and organ-related disabilities certified in May 2024. The deposition was completed at 12:18 PM after cross-examination by the respondent's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case