Inspector of Police, DCB, Theni vs Victor and 1 another Advocate - Muthukumaran.M.S — 500324/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,294(b),506(i). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTH020040532016
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
500517/2016
Filing Date
14-11-2016
Registration No
500324/2016
Registration Date
14-11-2016
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Theni
Judge
12-Judicial Magistrate Additional Mahila Court
FIR Details
FIR Number
12
Police Station
D.C.B P.S.Theni
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, DCB, Theni
Adv. app
Respondent(s)
Victor and 1 another Advocate - Muthukumaran.M.S
Anitha
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Judicial Magistrate Additional Mahila Court
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This case involves a complaint by the Inspector of Police against Victor and Muthukumaran regarding an alleged cheating/fraud scheme. The affidavit (dated 15.03.2024) details how the respondents allegedly promised job assistance and fraudulently obtained approximately ₹14,50,000 from the complainant and family members through multiple payments between 2012-2013, providing fake bank drafts and cheques in return. The court's order permitted the respondents' petition under CrPC Section 317 (allowing accused to remain absent) and directed them to pay outstanding compensation of ₹4,50,000 within 2-3 days, with the case proceeding in their absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This case involves a complaint by the Inspector of Police against Victor and Muthukumaran regarding an alleged cheating/fraud scheme. The affidavit (dated 15.03.2024) details how the respondents allegedly promised job assistance and fraudulently obtained approximately ₹14,50,000 from the complainant and family members through multiple payments between 2012-2013, providing fake bank drafts and cheques in return. The court's order permitted the respondents' petition under CrPC Section 317 (allowing accused to remain absent) and directed them to pay outstanding compensation of ₹4,50,000 within 2-3 days, with the case proceeding in their absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts