Pay 10 Services Private Ltd by its Authorized Signatory vs Inspector of Police, CCD III, Cyber Crime Wing, Theni — 807/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTH020013412026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
1291/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
807/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Theni
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
50
Police Station
Cyber Crime Police Station Theni
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pay 10 Services Private Ltd by its Authorized Signatory
Adv. S. VIDHYA SAGAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police, CCD III, Cyber Crime Wing, Theni
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Pay 10 Services Private Ltd v. Inspector of Police, CCD III, Cyber Crime Wing, Theni (Case No. 807/2026) The Judicial Magistrate ruled that police violated Section 107 BNSS by freezing Pay 10 Services' ₹150-crore escrow account without prior court approval, finding such unilateral action arbitrary and unconstitutional. The court partially allowed the petition, directing the bank to release all but ₹3.44 crores (corresponding to 13 identified cyber fraud complaints) while requiring the company's full cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2026
Orders
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Await Reports
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 807/2026
Case Summary: Pay 10 Services Private Ltd v. Inspector of Police, CCD III, Cyber Crime Wing, Theni (Case No. 807/2026) The Judicial Magistrate ruled that police violated Section 107 BNSS by freezing Pay 10 Services' ₹150-crore escrow account without prior court approval, finding such unilateral action arbitrary and unconstitutional. The court partially allowed the petition, directing the bank to release all but ₹3.44 crores (corresponding to 13 identified cyber fraud complaints) while requiring the company's full cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts