Pavithra vs Sub Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime Branch III P.S, Theni. CSR-124/2026 — 826/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497 R/W 503. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTH020012732026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
1223/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
826/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Theni
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
124
Police Station
Cyber Crime Police Station Theni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pavithra
Adv. ANU J
Respondent(s)
Sub Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime Branch III P.S, Theni. CSR-124/2026
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Await Reports
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Await Reports |
| 11-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 826/2026 Petitioner: Pavithra | Respondent: Sub Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime Branch III, Theni (CSR-124/2026) Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate ordered the release of ₹51,284 frozen in a Bandhan Bank account to petitioner Pavithra's HDFC account (No. 50100114726561), subject to two conditions: (1) Pavithra must furnish two sureties of ₹25,000 each, and (2) she must cooperate with the investigation. The court held that since the frozen funds resulted from online fraud perpetrated through "mule accounts," all seized money should be presumed to belong to the victim, and there was no valid reason to withhold release, as no obstacle existed to prevent the respondent from initiating recovery proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 826/2026 Petitioner: Pavithra | Respondent: Sub Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime Branch III, Theni (CSR-124/2026) Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate ordered the release of ₹51,284 frozen in a Bandhan Bank account to petitioner Pavithra's HDFC account (No. 50100114726561), subject to two conditions: (1) Pavithra must furnish two sureties of ₹25,000 each, and (2) she must cooperate with the investigation. The court held that since the frozen funds resulted from online fraud perpetrated through "mule accounts," all seized money should be presumed to belong to the victim, and there was no valid reason to withhold release, as no obstacle existed to prevent the respondent from initiating recovery proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts