vizhal vs cyber crime police theni — 605/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497A ND 503. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTH020010192026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

972/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

605/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Theni

Judge

5-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497A ND 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.vizhal

    Adv. Thangaprabu C

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.cyber crime police theni

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 605/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate granted Vishal's petition and allowed him interim custody of a NOTHING-A063 mobile phone (seized in a cyber crime investigation) to prevent property deterioration, citing Supreme Court precedent on avoiding damage from detention. Conditions: Vishal must execute a Rs. 10,000 bond, undertake to produce the phone when required, refrain from altering it, provide attested photographs with affidavit, and submit to panchanama inspection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Await Reports

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 605/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 605/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate granted Vishal's petition and allowed him interim custody of a NOTHING-A063 mobile phone (seized in a cyber crime investigation) to prevent property deterioration, citing Supreme Court precedent on avoiding damage from detention. Conditions: Vishal must execute a Rs. 10,000 bond, undertake to produce the phone when required, refrain from altering it, provide attested photographs with affidavit, and submit to panchanama inspection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case