Inspector of Police, P.C.Patty P.S vs Ramalingam and 1 other Advocate - s.k.murugan — 500206/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 448,294(b),355,323,506(i). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 10-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTH020008042016

Filing Number

500218/2016

Filing Date

05-Aug-2016

Registration No

500206/2016

Registration Date

06-Aug-2016

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Theni

Judge

5-Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

259

Police Station

Palanichettipatty P.S.

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 448,294(b),355,323,506(i)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, P.C.Patty P.S

    Adv. app

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramalingam and 1 other Advocate - s.k.murugan

  2. 2.Jeyalakshmi @ Jeya

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 30-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 05-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  10. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  11. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  12. 18-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  13. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  14. 23-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  15. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  16. 28-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  17. 03-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  18. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  19. 27-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  20. 28-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  21. 07-Oct-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This case (206/2016) involves a family dispute where an 80-year-old complainant alleged assault by two respondents (nephew and his wife) approximately 8 years prior, claiming they beat him and threatened him. The complainant filed an FIR with police. During examination, testimonies were recorded regarding the alleged incident, property disputes, and the complainant's claim of injuries sustained. The court examined evidence including the complainant's fingerprint on the FIR statement. The respondents contested the allegations during cross-examination, disputing the complainant's account of events and claiming no actual assault occurred. The court's final order upheld that while a property dispute exists between parties, the prosecution failed to prove the assault charges conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  22. 07-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  23. 10-Sep-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  24. 12-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  25. 22-Jul-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  26. 11-Jun-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  27. 13-May-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  28. 25-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  29. 15-Feb-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  30. 11-Jan-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  31. 08-Nov-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  32. 11-Sep-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  33. 01-Aug-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  34. 19-Jun-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  35. 09-May-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  36. 20-Mar-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  37. 31-Jan-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  38. 29-Dec-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  39. 15-Nov-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  40. 18-Oct-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  41. 20-Sep-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  42. 29-Aug-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  43. 25-Jul-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  44. 28-Jun-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  45. 26-May-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  46. 29-Mar-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  47. 09-Feb-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  48. 28-Dec-2021

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  49. 01-Nov-2021

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  50. 24-Aug-2021

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  51. 26-Jul-2021

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  52. 07-Jun-2021

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  53. 08-Apr-2021

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  54. 04-Dec-2020

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  55. 04-Aug-2020

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  56. 05-May-2020

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  57. 16-Apr-2020

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  58. 05-Mar-2020

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  59. 06-Feb-2020

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  60. 12-Dec-2019

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  61. 26-Nov-2019

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  62. 22-Oct-2019

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  63. 06-Aug-2019

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  64. 16-Jul-2019

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  65. 08-May-2019

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  66. 26-Feb-2019

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  67. 08-Jan-2019

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  68. 22-Nov-2018

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  69. 26-Oct-2018

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  70. 17-Sep-2018

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  71. 10-Jul-2018

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  72. 14-Mar-2018

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  73. 11-Dec-2017

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  74. 03-Oct-2017

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  75. 13-Jun-2017

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  76. 03-Mar-2017

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  77. 01-Nov-2016

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  78. 07-Oct-2016

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  79. 02-Sep-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  80. 05-Aug-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 500206/2016

casestatus.in Summary

This case (206/2016) involves a family dispute where an 80-year-old complainant alleged assault by two respondents (nephew and his wife) approximately 8 years prior, claiming they beat him and threatened him. The complainant filed an FIR with police. During examination, testimonies were recorded regarding the alleged incident, property disputes, and the complainant's claim of injuries sustained. The court examined evidence including the complainant's fingerprint on the FIR statement. The respondents contested the allegations during cross-examination, disputing the complainant's account of events and claiming no actual assault occurred. The court's final order upheld that while a property dispute exists between parties, the prosecution failed to prove the assault charges conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case