sub inspector of police palanichettypatti vs kannan — 100/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(4),296(b),118(1),351(3),118(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th April 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTH020007742025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

28-01-2025

Filing Number

749/2025

Filing Date

21-02-2025

Registration No

100/2025

Registration Date

24-02-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Theni

Judge

5-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

446

Police Station

Palanichettipatty P.S.

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(4),296(b),118(1),351(3),118(2)
MP/2/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section sub inspector of police palanichettypatti
MP/3/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section sub inspector of police palanichettypatti

Petitioner(s)

sub inspector of police palanichettypatti

Adv. Sub Inspector of Police Palanichettipatti Police Station

Respondent(s)

kannan

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate

10-04-2026

Disposed

07-04-2026

Judgement

01-04-2026

Questioning

25-03-2026

Trial

23-03-2026

Trial

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: CC No. 100/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted all four accused (Kannan, Pathikaali, Kirukumani, and Supp) of charges under BNS Sections 329(4), 296(b), 118(1), 351(3), and 118(2), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court determined that two key prosecution witnesses (complainant and witness-2) gave contradictory testimony, claiming no prior dispute existed despite the FIR alleging they trespassed the complainant's home and assaulted him with iron rods and stones on November 1, 2024. The investigating officer's testimony alone was insufficient to establish the charges, particularly given the credibility issues with other witnesses. Consequently, the accused were discharged under BNS Section 271(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 100/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted all four accused (Kannan, Pathikaali, Kirukumani, and Supp) of charges under BNS Sections 329(4), 296(b), 118(1), 351(3), and 118(2), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court determined that two key prosecution witnesses (complainant and witness-2) gave contradictory testimony, claiming no prior dispute existed despite the FIR alleging they trespassed the complainant's home and assaulted him with iron rods and stones on November 1, 2024. The investigating officer's testimony alone was insufficient to establish the charges, particularly given the credibility issues with other witnesses. Consequently, the accused were discharged under BNS Section 271(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Theni All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case