State Government vs Murugesan 3 others Advocate - T.KRISHNAKUMAR — 500378/2013
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 465,468,471,420,120. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTH020007182013
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
500378/2013
Filing Date
06-07-2013
Registration No
500378/2013
Registration Date
06-07-2013
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Theni
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
796
Police Station
Allinagaram P.S.
Year
2010
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Murugesan 3 others Advocate - T.KRISHNAKUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness examination record in Case 378/2013 from the Judicial Magistrate Court in Theni. The witness (Chandralaa) was examined on 23.01.2026 regarding property matters involving Survey No. 808 and Patta No. 502. The witness testified about property sales to Banraj and Ramasamy, related civil suits (OS.No.236/1996, OS.No.302/1998, OS.No.288/2001), and an appeal case (AS.No.43/2010) where a judgment was delivered on 15.10.2010. The testimony was recorded, transcribed, read back to the witness, and the witness confirmed its accuracy before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness examination record in Case 378/2013 from the Judicial Magistrate Court in Theni. The witness (Chandralaa) was examined on 23.01.2026 regarding property matters involving Survey No. 808 and Patta No. 502. The witness testified about property sales to Banraj and Ramasamy, related civil suits (OS.No.236/1996, OS.No.302/1998, OS.No.288/2001), and an appeal case (AS.No.43/2010) where a judgment was delivered on 15.10.2010. The testimony was recorded, transcribed, read back to the witness, and the witness confirmed its accuracy before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts