Aathiyappan vs Krishnamoorthy — 12/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order41Rule96. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th April 2026.
AS - Appeal Suit
CNR: TNTH010073212022
Filing Number
11374/2022
Filing Date
19-Dec-2022
Registration No
12/2023
Registration Date
27-Mar-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Theni
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Aathiyappan
Adv. Murugan.A
Respondent(s)
-
1.Krishnamoorthy
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary of Case 12/2023 - Aathiyappan v. Krishnamoorthy The Principal District Judge set aside the trial court's decree and allowed defendant Aathiyappan's appeal, finding that the trial court erred in granting relief based on improperly moulded pleadings. While the trial court correctly determined that the mortgage deed dated 31.12.2012 was not a genuine mortgage (but rather a customary practice between dairy farm owners and milk suppliers), it improperly converted the dismissed mortgage claim into a simple loan recovery decree based solely on the defendant's admission of receiving ₹2,00,000, ignoring his counterclaim that ₹1,70,000 had been repaid, leaving only ₹30,000 outstanding. The appellate court held that relief cannot be moulded without specific pleadings and found the trial court's selective consideration of admissions prejudicial to the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
08-Jan-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
30-Oct-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
04-Sep-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
28-Aug-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
07-Aug-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
31-Jul-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
17-Jul-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
03-Jul-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
27-Jun-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
12-Jun-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
24-Apr-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
20-Mar-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
26-Feb-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
27-Jan-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
16-Dec-2024
Arguments
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
16-Nov-2024
Arguments
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
21-Oct-2024
Arguments
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
21-Sep-2024
Arguments
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
20-Sep-2024
Arguments
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
06-Sep-2024
Arguments
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
29-Aug-2024
Arguments
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
23-Aug-2024
Arguments
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
21-Aug-2024
Arguments
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
14-Aug-2024
Arguments
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
31-Jul-2024
Arguments
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
30-Jul-2024
Arguments
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
26-Jun-2024
Arguments
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
07-Jun-2024
Arguments
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
04-Jun-2024
Arguments
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
08-Apr-2024
For Discovery / Inspection / Production
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
27-Mar-2024
For Discovery / Inspection / Production
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
19-Mar-2024
For Discovery / Inspection / Production
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
15-Mar-2024
Orders
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
29-Feb-2024
Orders
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
19-Feb-2024
Orders
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
24-Jan-2024
Orders
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
09-Jan-2024
Orders
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
22-Dec-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
15-Dec-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
08-Dec-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
19-Oct-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
05-Sep-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
22-Aug-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
31-Jul-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
13-Jul-2023
Arguments
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
22-Jun-2023
Arguments
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
27-Apr-2023
Service Pending-Notice
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
30-Mar-2023
Service Pending-Notice
Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
-
27-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 12/2023
Summary of Case 12/2023 - Aathiyappan v. Krishnamoorthy The Principal District Judge set aside the trial court's decree and allowed defendant Aathiyappan's appeal, finding that the trial court erred in granting relief based on improperly moulded pleadings. While the trial court correctly determined that the mortgage deed dated 31.12.2012 was not a genuine mortgage (but rather a customary practice between dairy farm owners and milk suppliers), it improperly converted the dismissed mortgage claim into a simple loan recovery decree based solely on the defendant's admission of receiving ₹2,00,000, ignoring his counterclaim that ₹1,70,000 had been repaid, leaving only ₹30,000 outstanding. The appellate court held that relief cannot be moulded without specific pleadings and found the trial court's selective consideration of admissions prejudicial to the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts