Menaga and 2 others vs Dinesh and 2 others Advocate - Exp — 220/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,141,142,163A,163B,166,183A. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTH010050232022
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
10905/2022
Filing Date
02-09-2022
Registration No
220/2022
Registration Date
03-09-2022
Court
Principal District Court, Theni
Judge
9-Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Menaga and 2 others
Adv. Suresh Kumar.P
Minor. Sugirtha through his Mother
Adv. Suresh Kumar.P
Rakkammal
Adv. Suresh Kumar.P
Respondent(s)
Dinesh and 2 others Advocate - Exp
V. Ganesan
Adv. Exp
Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co.Ltd, Madurai
Adv. Venkateshwaran.S
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Appearance
Batta
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 28-01-2026 | Appearance |
| 10-12-2025 | Batta |
Interim Orders
Case 220/2022 Summary: On February 13, 2026, the Additional District Fast-Track Court in Theni recorded the testimony of PW1 John Sellathuray, a sub-inspector from Kandamanaur Police Station, regarding FIR 114/2022. The witness testified about the final police report filed in the case, identifying the deceased as Kumar and the accused as Dinesh. The second respondent's counsel declined to cross-examine the witness, and the examination was concluded. The testimony was transcribed, read back to the witness, and signed on the court record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 220/2022 Summary: On February 13, 2026, the Additional District Fast-Track Court in Theni recorded the testimony of PW1 John Sellathuray, a sub-inspector from Kandamanaur Police Station, regarding FIR 114/2022. The witness testified about the final police report filed in the case, identifying the deceased as Kumar and the accused as Dinesh. The second respondent's counsel declined to cross-examine the witness, and the examination was concluded. The testimony was transcribed, read back to the witness, and signed on the court record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts