Lakshmi alias Lakshmiyammal vs Muthuvel and 2 Others — 191/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order7Rule1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTH010038332024

Evidence

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

896/2024

Filing Date

14-10-2024

Registration No

191/2024

Registration Date

16-10-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Theni

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section Order7Rule1
COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 22

Petitioner(s)

Lakshmi alias Lakshmiyammal

Adv. Maran.V

Respondent(s)

Muthuvel and 2 Others

Prema

Muthu Harish

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

24-04-2026

Evidence

16-04-2026

Evidence

09-04-2026

Evidence

02-04-2026

Evidence

27-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

24-04-2026
Copy of Deposition

Case Summary: O.S. No. 191/2024 Date: 24.04.2026 On this date, witness PW 2 (Balamurugan) was recalled and re-examined under cross-examination by the defendant's counsel. The witness testified about his 30-year acquaintance with petitioner Lakshmi, confirming she engages in agricultural lease farming. He stated he first met the defendant on the date the deed was executed and has no knowledge of prior property partition details. The witness acknowledged seeing the defendant sign the deed and witnessing another signatory (Saktivel) for the first time that day. He clarified he did not independently verify the defendant's details and admitted bias, noting he was providing evidence because Lakshmi is his relative. The court recorded this testimony in open court and the witness affixed his signature after confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 191/2024 Date: 24.04.2026 On this date, witness PW 2 (Balamurugan) was recalled and re-examined under cross-examination by the defendant's counsel. The witness testified about his 30-year acquaintance with petitioner Lakshmi, confirming she engages in agricultural lease farming. He stated he first met the defendant on the date the deed was executed and has no knowledge of prior property partition details. The witness acknowledged seeing the defendant sign the deed and witnessing another signatory (Saktivel) for the first time that day. He clarified he did not independently verify the defendant's details and admitted bias, noting he was providing evidence because Lakshmi is his relative. The court recorded this testimony in open court and the witness affixed his signature after confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Theni All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case