Lakshmi alias Lakshmiyammal vs Muthuvel and 2 Others — 191/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order7Rule1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTH010038332024
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
896/2024
Filing Date
14-10-2024
Registration No
191/2024
Registration Date
16-10-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Theni
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lakshmi alias Lakshmiyammal
Adv. Maran.V
Respondent(s)
Muthuvel and 2 Others
Prema
Muthu Harish
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. No. 191/2024 Date: 24.04.2026 On this date, witness PW 2 (Balamurugan) was recalled and re-examined under cross-examination by the defendant's counsel. The witness testified about his 30-year acquaintance with petitioner Lakshmi, confirming she engages in agricultural lease farming. He stated he first met the defendant on the date the deed was executed and has no knowledge of prior property partition details. The witness acknowledged seeing the defendant sign the deed and witnessing another signatory (Saktivel) for the first time that day. He clarified he did not independently verify the defendant's details and admitted bias, noting he was providing evidence because Lakshmi is his relative. The court recorded this testimony in open court and the witness affixed his signature after confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. No. 191/2024 Date: 24.04.2026 On this date, witness PW 2 (Balamurugan) was recalled and re-examined under cross-examination by the defendant's counsel. The witness testified about his 30-year acquaintance with petitioner Lakshmi, confirming she engages in agricultural lease farming. He stated he first met the defendant on the date the deed was executed and has no knowledge of prior property partition details. The witness acknowledged seeing the defendant sign the deed and witnessing another signatory (Saktivel) for the first time that day. He clarified he did not independently verify the defendant's details and admitted bias, noting he was providing evidence because Lakshmi is his relative. The court recorded this testimony in open court and the witness affixed his signature after confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts