P.Sundarammal vs K.Jeyaprakash and 2 others Advocate - Exp — 155/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,141,142,163A,163B,166,182(A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTH010037642021
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
786/2021
Filing Date
14-09-2021
Registration No
155/2021
Registration Date
17-09-2021
Court
Principal District Court, Theni
Judge
9-Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.Sundarammal
Adv. Kajamydeen.S
Respondent(s)
K.Jeyaprakash and 2 others Advocate - Exp
Abdul Hakeem
Adv. Pandiyaraja. K
The Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Limited
Adv. Exp
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 155/2021 Court: Additional District Court, Theni Date: December 2, 2025 Outcome: On December 2, 2025, witness PW2 Sudhakar testified in the matter filed by petitioner P. Sundarammal against K. Jeyaprakash and others. The witness was examined and cross-examined regarding a road accident involving a two-wheeler that resulted in a death. The court recorded the witness's sworn testimony after examination by both the petitioner's counsel and the respondent's counsel (whose cross-examination was subsequently closed due to counsel's absence). The case proceedings continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 155/2021 Court: Additional District Court, Theni Date: December 2, 2025 Outcome: On December 2, 2025, witness PW2 Sudhakar testified in the matter filed by petitioner P. Sundarammal against K. Jeyaprakash and others. The witness was examined and cross-examined regarding a road accident involving a two-wheeler that resulted in a death. The court recorded the witness's sworn testimony after examination by both the petitioner's counsel and the respondent's counsel (whose cross-examination was subsequently closed due to counsel's absence). The case proceedings continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts