The Inspector of Police, Palanichettipatti Police Station vs Raja and 9 Others — 136/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 306,506(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNTH010035722025
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
2806/2025
Filing Date
22-10-2025
Registration No
136/2025
Registration Date
05-11-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Theni
Judge
9-Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
FIR Details
FIR Number
152
Police Station
Palanichettipatty P.S.
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Inspector of Police, Palanichettipatti Police Station
Respondent(s)
Raja and 9 Others
Mokkapandi
Manimaran
Arulvasagan
Mahendran
Adv. Subramanian. M.V
Selvakumar
Jayamani
Kurumbathevar
Silambarasan
Thilsan (Died)
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary - 136/2025 On April 29, 2026, the Additional District Fast-Track Court, Theni, recorded witness testimony (PW13/LW15) regarding an alleged financial institution operation by the respondents. The witness, a Tahsildar, testified that on July 17, 2025, police inquired whether permission was granted to respondents Raja, Mokkapandi, Manimaran and others to operate a finance business; he responded that no such permission was issued. The court admitted the witness statement into record after cross-examination by all parties present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - 136/2025 On April 29, 2026, the Additional District Fast-Track Court, Theni, recorded witness testimony (PW13/LW15) regarding an alleged financial institution operation by the respondents. The witness, a Tahsildar, testified that on July 17, 2025, police inquired whether permission was granted to respondents Raja, Mokkapandi, Manimaran and others to operate a finance business; he responded that no such permission was issued. The court admitted the witness statement into record after cross-examination by all parties present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts