Pandiyarajan vs Senthil .A — 157/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 05-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTH010031152024

Filing Number

708/2024

Filing Date

30-Aug-2024

Registration No

157/2024

Registration Date

03-Sep-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Theni

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1
Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pandiyarajan

    Adv. Maran.V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Senthil .A

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S. No. 157/2024 Date: 13.03.2026 Petitioner: Pandiyarajan | Respondent: Senthil .A The court recorded the cross-examination of PW1 (Pandiyarajan) in this civil suit concerning a loan dispute. The witness testified regarding a Rs. 2 lakh loan allegedly given to respondent Senthil with partial repayments of Rs. 1 lakh (05.10.2017) and Rs. 49,000 (02.05.2019), leaving approximately Rs. 51,000 outstanding. The witness clarified inconsistencies in his affidavit regarding loan documentation, witness details, and payment methods. Court Finding: The suit was adjourned for further proceedings; the case remains pending with cross-examination concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  9. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  10. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  11. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  12. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  13. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  14. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  15. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  16. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  17. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  18. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  19. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  20. 31-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  21. 31-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  22. 10-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  23. 11-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  24. 21-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  25. 01-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  26. 04-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  27. 21-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  28. 24-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge

  29. 24-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge

  30. 03-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge

  31. 04-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge

  32. 20-Dec-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  33. 21-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  34. 18-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  35. 03-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 30-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 157/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 157/2024 Date: 13.03.2026 Petitioner: Pandiyarajan | Respondent: Senthil .A The court recorded the cross-examination of PW1 (Pandiyarajan) in this civil suit concerning a loan dispute. The witness testified regarding a Rs. 2 lakh loan allegedly given to respondent Senthil with partial repayments of Rs. 1 lakh (05.10.2017) and Rs. 49,000 (02.05.2019), leaving approximately Rs. 51,000 outstanding. The witness clarified inconsistencies in his affidavit regarding loan documentation, witness details, and payment methods. Court Finding: The suit was adjourned for further proceedings; the case remains pending with cross-examination concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case