R. Alagarsamy vs T. Neeraj Advocate - Sundarrajkumar.S.M — 108/2020
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1. Status: Mediation. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTH010027522020
Next Hearing
01st July 2026
Filing Number
464/2020
Filing Date
22-07-2020
Registration No
108/2020
Registration Date
24-07-2020
Court
Principal District Court, Theni
Judge
9-Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R. Alagarsamy
Adv. Ramakrishnan.A
Respondent(s)
T. Neeraj Advocate - Sundarrajkumar.S.M
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
Mediation
Evidence
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Mediation |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. 108/2020 Court: Additional District Court, Theni Date: February 24, 2026 On February 24, 2026, witness PW3 (Senthil, 47-year-old Office Assistant) testified in this civil suit. The witness provided affidavit evidence regarding a loan agreement dated December 19, 2018, between the petitioner and Defendant 1, involving disputed amounts of ₹25 lakh and ₹15 lakh. During cross-examination by defendants 2, 3, and 4, the witness's credibility was challenged regarding document authenticity and backdating allegations. The case proceeded with oral testimony being recorded, transcribed, read back to the witness, and signed. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. 108/2020 Court: Additional District Court, Theni Date: February 24, 2026 On February 24, 2026, witness PW3 (Senthil, 47-year-old Office Assistant) testified in this civil suit. The witness provided affidavit evidence regarding a loan agreement dated December 19, 2018, between the petitioner and Defendant 1, involving disputed amounts of ₹25 lakh and ₹15 lakh. During cross-examination by defendants 2, 3, and 4, the witness's credibility was challenged regarding document authenticity and backdating allegations. The case proceeded with oral testimony being recorded, transcribed, read back to the witness, and signed. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts