Singaraj vs Vallimayil Advocate - Guru.Rathakrishnan.G — 164/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order7Rule1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTH010027392025
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
650/2025
Filing Date
13-08-2025
Registration No
164/2025
Registration Date
26-08-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Theni
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Singaraj
Adv. Muthukumaran. M.S
Respondent(s)
Vallimayil Advocate - Guru.Rathakrishnan.G
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-02-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. No. 164/2025 Date: 26.03.2026 This is a property sale agreement dispute. Witness PW 2 (Veerushinnu) testified regarding a transaction where the petitioner (Singaraj) provided money to purchase property from the respondent (Vallimayil) for medical treatment needs. The witness's cross-examination covered disputed facts: whether the respondent initiated completion after her husband's death, her refusal to return funds, attempts to sell to third parties, and the petitioner's subsequent construction investments. The court recorded the witness testimony in open court, documented it, and obtained the witness's signature after confirmation. Order: Witness examination completed and testimony recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. No. 164/2025 Date: 26.03.2026 This is a property sale agreement dispute. Witness PW 2 (Veerushinnu) testified regarding a transaction where the petitioner (Singaraj) provided money to purchase property from the respondent (Vallimayil) for medical treatment needs. The witness's cross-examination covered disputed facts: whether the respondent initiated completion after her husband's death, her refusal to return funds, attempts to sell to third parties, and the petitioner's subsequent construction investments. The court recorded the witness testimony in open court, documented it, and obtained the witness's signature after confirmation. Order: Witness examination completed and testimony recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts