Singaraj vs Vallimayil Advocate - Guru.Rathakrishnan.G — 164/2025

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order7Rule1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTH010027392025

Evidence

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

Filing Number

650/2025

Filing Date

13-08-2025

Registration No

164/2025

Registration Date

26-08-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Theni

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section Order7Rule1
COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 22

Petitioner(s)

Singaraj

Adv. Muthukumaran. M.S

Respondent(s)

Vallimayil Advocate - Guru.Rathakrishnan.G

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

09-04-2026

Evidence

26-03-2026

Evidence

13-03-2026

Evidence

27-02-2026

Evidence

06-02-2026

Trial

Interim Orders

14-11-2025
Copy of Decree
26-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

Case Summary: O.S. No. 164/2025 Date: 26.03.2026 This is a property sale agreement dispute. Witness PW 2 (Veerushinnu) testified regarding a transaction where the petitioner (Singaraj) provided money to purchase property from the respondent (Vallimayil) for medical treatment needs. The witness's cross-examination covered disputed facts: whether the respondent initiated completion after her husband's death, her refusal to return funds, attempts to sell to third parties, and the petitioner's subsequent construction investments. The court recorded the witness testimony in open court, documented it, and obtained the witness's signature after confirmation. Order: Witness examination completed and testimony recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 164/2025 Date: 26.03.2026 This is a property sale agreement dispute. Witness PW 2 (Veerushinnu) testified regarding a transaction where the petitioner (Singaraj) provided money to purchase property from the respondent (Vallimayil) for medical treatment needs. The witness's cross-examination covered disputed facts: whether the respondent initiated completion after her husband's death, her refusal to return funds, attempts to sell to third parties, and the petitioner's subsequent construction investments. The court recorded the witness testimony in open court, documented it, and obtained the witness's signature after confirmation. Order: Witness examination completed and testimony recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Theni All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case