Canara Bank Narayanathevanpatty Branch Rep by its Branch Manager Karthikeyan.R vs R Rajasekar Advocate - Kajamydeen.S — 149/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section order7rule1. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 27th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTH010026282025
e-Filing Number
08-07-2025
Filing Number
611/2025
Filing Date
02-08-2025
Registration No
149/2025
Registration Date
07-08-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Theni
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Canara Bank Narayanathevanpatty Branch Rep by its Branch Manager Karthikeyan.R
Adv. Murugesan Muruga Dhinakaran
Respondent(s)
R Rajasekar Advocate - Kajamydeen.S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 17-04-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 02-04-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 23-03-2026 | Written Statement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Canara Bank v. R. Rajasekar (O.S.No.149/2025) The Principal District Court, Theni decreed Canara Bank's suit for recovery of Rs.12,61,661/- against defendant R. Rajasekar on 27 April 2026. The defendant had defaulted on two loans—an OD/CC scheme loan of Rs.5,00,000/- (11.05% p.a.) and a TLS scheme loan of Rs.8,97,000/- (12.20% p.a.)—both sanctioned in 2022-2023, despite repeated demands and a demand notice. The court rendered an ex parte judgment after the defendant failed to appear, holding him liable to pay the outstanding amount with 7.5% interest per annum from the date of plaint until realization, plus court costs, within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Canara Bank v. R. Rajasekar (O.S.No.149/2025) The Principal District Court, Theni decreed Canara Bank's suit for recovery of Rs.12,61,661/- against defendant R. Rajasekar on 27 April 2026. The defendant had defaulted on two loans—an OD/CC scheme loan of Rs.5,00,000/- (11.05% p.a.) and a TLS scheme loan of Rs.8,97,000/- (12.20% p.a.)—both sanctioned in 2022-2023, despite repeated demands and a demand notice. The court rendered an ex parte judgment after the defendant failed to appear, holding him liable to pay the outstanding amount with 7.5% interest per annum from the date of plaint until realization, plus court costs, within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts