The Canara Bank, Rep by its Chief Manager, Theni Branch vs Arivalagan Advocate - Subramani.O — 113/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order7Rule1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTH010013222025
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
15-04-2025
Filing Number
341/2025
Filing Date
21-04-2025
Registration No
113/2025
Registration Date
19-06-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Theni
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Canara Bank, Rep by its Chief Manager, Theni Branch
Adv. SUNDARARAJ G
Respondent(s)
Arivalagan Advocate - Subramani.O
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS 113/2025 This is a civil case between Canara Bank (petitioner) and Arivalagan Advocate Subramani.O (respondent) in the Principal District Judge Court, Theni. The document records the deposition of witness P.W.1 on 06.03.2026, who affirmed testimony in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness presented 19 documentary exhibits including loan applications, agreements, hypothecation documents, property deeds, and account statements related to multiple loan facilities (CKOD, KCCS, and KISAN OD). Cross-examination of the witness was adjourned at the advocate's request. The court recorded and confirmed the witness's testimony through digital transcription. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS 113/2025 This is a civil case between Canara Bank (petitioner) and Arivalagan Advocate Subramani.O (respondent) in the Principal District Judge Court, Theni. The document records the deposition of witness P.W.1 on 06.03.2026, who affirmed testimony in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness presented 19 documentary exhibits including loan applications, agreements, hypothecation documents, property deeds, and account statements related to multiple loan facilities (CKOD, KCCS, and KISAN OD). Cross-examination of the witness was adjourned at the advocate's request. The court recorded and confirmed the witness's testimony through digital transcription. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts