Meenakshi vs Murugan and 9 others Advocate - Balamurugan.S.T — 100059/2015
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 7Rule1CPC. Status: Stay. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTH010009192015
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
698/2015
Filing Date
29-10-2015
Registration No
100059/2015
Registration Date
29-10-2015
Court
Principal District Court, Theni
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Meenakshi
Adv. Namasivayam.N
Respondent(s)
Murugan and 9 others Advocate - Balamurugan.S.T
Shanmugam
Adv. Balamurugan.S.T
Lakshmi
Adv. Balamurugan.S.T
Palani Andavar
Adv. Balamurugan.S.T
Arumugam
Muthukumaresan
Adv. Balamurugan.S.T
Kandhasamy
Adv. Balamurgan.S.T
Somasundaram
Adv. Jeyakumar.M.
Bala Subramani
Adv. Balamurugan.S.T
Swaminathan
Adv. Muthuramalingam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Stay
Stay
Stay
Stay
Stay
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Stay |
| 13-03-2026 | Stay |
| 05-03-2026 | Stay |
| 22-01-2026 | Stay |
| 12-12-2025 | Stay |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Meenakshi v. Murugan and 9 Others (OS No. 59/2015) Court & Date: Principal District Judge, Theni; March 16, 2022 Outcome: Suit allowed with preliminary decree for partition and permanent injunction granted. Meenakshi, a daughter in a Hindu family, filed suit seeking partition of ancestral properties (house and land in Bodi) and her 1/11th share. The properties descended from grandparents Masanam and Veerakamulu Ammal to her father Subramani (who died November 2013), who had 9 sons and 2 daughters as legal heirs. The court found the suit maintainable (not barred by "partial partition" arguments), confirmed Meenakshi's equal 1/11th entitlement in the three scheduled properties, and granted injunction restraining defendants from alienating her share pending final partition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Meenakshi v. Murugan and 9 Others (OS No. 59/2015) Court & Date: Principal District Judge, Theni; March 16, 2022 Outcome: Suit allowed with preliminary decree for partition and permanent injunction granted. Meenakshi, a daughter in a Hindu family, filed suit seeking partition of ancestral properties (house and land in Bodi) and her 1/11th share. The properties descended from grandparents Masanam and Veerakamulu Ammal to her father Subramani (who died November 2013), who had 9 sons and 2 daughters as legal heirs. The court found the suit maintainable (not barred by "partial partition" arguments), confirmed Meenakshi's equal 1/11th entitlement in the three scheduled properties, and granted injunction restraining defendants from alienating her share pending final partition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts