Sekar and another vs The Managing Director, M/s. New Generation Media Corporation (p), Chennai and anothr Advocate - Sudhakar — 21/2020
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,141,166,182A. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTH010005802020
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
120/2020
Filing Date
29-01-2020
Registration No
21/2020
Registration Date
29-01-2020
Court
Principal District Court, Theni
Judge
9-Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sekar and another
Adv. Nagaraj.S
Vijaya
Adv. Nagaraj.S
Respondent(s)
The Managing Director, M/s. New Generation Media Corporation (p), Chennai and anothr Advocate - Sudhakar
M. Sakthi Manikandan
Adv. Exp
The Branch Manager, Reliance General Insurance Co., Ltd.,
Adv. Shyam.S.R
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: MCOP No. 21/2020 Court: Additional District Court, Theni Date: October 30, 2025 This is a motor accident compensation petition (MCOP) arising from a fatal two-wheeler accident. The petitioner's son died in the accident, and the petitioner filed for compensation claiming the deceased was 18 years old at the time of the incident, though he was actually 19. During cross-examination on October 30, 2025, the petitioner (PW1) testified regarding discrepancies in the age stated in the petition and affidavit, vehicle ownership, insurance coverage, and lack of a valid driving license. The case remains pending with testimony recorded and the matter continuing for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: MCOP No. 21/2020 Court: Additional District Court, Theni Date: October 30, 2025 This is a motor accident compensation petition (MCOP) arising from a fatal two-wheeler accident. The petitioner's son died in the accident, and the petitioner filed for compensation claiming the deceased was 18 years old at the time of the incident, though he was actually 19. During cross-examination on October 30, 2025, the petitioner (PW1) testified regarding discrepancies in the age stated in the petition and affidavit, vehicle ownership, insurance coverage, and lack of a valid driving license. The case remains pending with testimony recorded and the matter continuing for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts