Vellaiyammal vs C.Selvam Advocate - Exp — 900017/2018
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,141,142,163,166,182A. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTH010003712018
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
294/2018
Filing Date
04-04-2018
Registration No
900017/2018
Registration Date
04-04-2018
Court
Principal District Court, Theni
Judge
9-Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vellaiyammal
Adv. Goplakrishnan.C
Respondent(s)
C.Selvam Advocate - Exp
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Additional District Judge Fast Track Court
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 28-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary (900017/2018): The Additional District Court at Theni heard witness testimony on November 18, 2025, regarding whether Sellathumi possessed a valid driving license to operate a two-wheeler vehicle as of September 9, 2014. The witness (RW1 Ariyanaachi), a government official, testified that no such driving license was issued. The court recorded the witness statement and admitted documentary evidence regarding the absence of a driving license. The case proceeded with examination of the respondent's counter-arguments regarding jurisdictional issues concerning the relevant vehicle registration office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary (900017/2018): The Additional District Court at Theni heard witness testimony on November 18, 2025, regarding whether Sellathumi possessed a valid driving license to operate a two-wheeler vehicle as of September 9, 2014. The witness (RW1 Ariyanaachi), a government official, testified that no such driving license was issued. The court recorded the witness statement and admitted documentary evidence regarding the absence of a driving license. The case proceeded with examination of the respondent's counter-arguments regarding jurisdictional issues concerning the relevant vehicle registration office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts