INSPECTOR OF POLICE SAKKOTTAI P.S vs AROCKIYA SELVAKUMAR — 41/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279, 338. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNSV190070192024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

26-09-2024

Filing Number

7018/2024

Filing Date

18-10-2024

Registration No

41/2025

Registration Date

26-02-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi

Judge

5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

339

Police Station

Sakkottai Police Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279, 338

Petitioner(s)

INSPECTOR OF POLICE SAKKOTTAI P.S

Adv. si of police si of police

Respondent(s)

AROCKIYA SELVAKUMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi

25-03-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

Judgement

23-03-2026

Questioning

17-03-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: S.T.C. No. 41/2025 The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Arockiya Selvakumar of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 338 (causing hurt by act endangering life), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the complainant and eyewitnesses could not identify the accused; key eyewitnesses turned hostile and denied knowing who drove the offending vehicle; mahazar witnesses admitted signing documents without understanding their contents; and the injured person died before trial, eliminating direct testimony. Medical evidence confirmed an accident occurred but could not establish the accused's identity as the driver or prove rash/negligent conduct. The court held that suspicion cannot replace proof in criminal cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.T.C. No. 41/2025 The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Arockiya Selvakumar of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 338 (causing hurt by act endangering life), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the complainant and eyewitnesses could not identify the accused; key eyewitnesses turned hostile and denied knowing who drove the offending vehicle; mahazar witnesses admitted signing documents without understanding their contents; and the injured person died before trial, eliminating direct testimony. Medical evidence confirmed an accident occurred but could not establish the accused's identity as the driver or prove rash/negligent conduct. The court held that suspicion cannot replace proof in criminal cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case