Aishwarya vs Satheesh — 39/2025

Case under Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--Partially Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

DVC - Domestic Violence Case

CNR: TNSV190058642025

e-Filing Number

19-12-2025

Filing Number

5864/2025

Filing Date

30-Dec-2025

Registration No

39/2025

Registration Date

30-Dec-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi

Judge

5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Partially Allowed

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Aishwarya

    Adv. bharathi raja

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Satheesh

  2. 2.Krishnan

  3. 3.Viji

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    IA orderView PDF

    The Karaikudi Judicial Magistrate court partially allowed a domestic violence petition filed by a woman against her husband and in-laws for subjecting her to mental and emotional cruelty after she gave birth to two daughters instead of sons. The court directed the husband to pay ₹20,000 monthly to the wife, ₹15,000 monthly each to the two minor daughters, ₹25,000 litigation costs, and ₹10 lakh compensation under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, while rejecting the claim for ₹50,000 loan repayment due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi

  6. 30-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 30-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 39/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Karaikudi Judicial Magistrate court partially allowed a domestic violence petition filed by a woman against her husband and in-laws for subjecting her to mental and emotional cruelty after she gave birth to two daughters instead of sons. The court directed the husband to pay ₹20,000 monthly to the wife, ₹15,000 monthly each to the two minor daughters, ₹25,000 litigation costs, and ₹10 lakh compensation under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, while rejecting the claim for ₹50,000 loan repayment due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case