SI. OF POLICE, KUNDRAKUDI PS vs PRAPU — 1876/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,324,324,506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV190054372022
Filing Number
3564/2022
Filing Date
07-10-2022
Registration No
1876/2022
Registration Date
11-10-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
35
Police Station
Kundrakudi Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI. OF POLICE, KUNDRAKUDI PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PRAPU
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC.No.1876/2022 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Prabhu of all charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, 506(2) and the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The primary complainant (PW1) and eyewitnesses (PW2, PW3) turned hostile during trial, contradicting their original statements and testifying that no offense occurred. With critical witnesses recanting and no independent corroborating evidence, the court held that the Investigating Officer's testimony alone was insufficient to sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC.No.1876/2022 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Prabhu of all charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, 506(2) and the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The primary complainant (PW1) and eyewitnesses (PW2, PW3) turned hostile during trial, contradicting their original statements and testifying that no offense occurred. With critical witnesses recanting and no independent corroborating evidence, the court held that the Investigating Officer's testimony alone was insufficient to sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts