Arivuselvi vs Sathuramesh — 2564/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 277(ii). Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV190049102025
Filing Number
4910/2025
Filing Date
08-10-2025
Registration No
2564/2025
Registration Date
08-10-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Partially Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arivuselvi
Adv. RAJARAM.S
Respondent(s)
Sathuramesh
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Disposed
Orders
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Orders |
| 17-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 12-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 02-02-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate of Karaikudi partially allowed Arivuselvi's petition under Section 254(2) of Cr.P.C to examine additional witnesses in her private complaint against Inspector Sathu Ramesh, who allegedly used disrespectful language and fabricated documents portraying her father as insane. The court permitted examination of only the second proposed witness (the petitioner's mother), finding her evidence potentially relevant to support the petitioner's version, but dismissed the petition regarding other witnesses—including senior police officials and an expert—as the petitioner failed to demonstrate their specific relevance and necessity to the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate of Karaikudi partially allowed Arivuselvi's petition under Section 254(2) of Cr.P.C to examine additional witnesses in her private complaint against Inspector Sathu Ramesh, who allegedly used disrespectful language and fabricated documents portraying her father as insane. The court permitted examination of only the second proposed witness (the petitioner's mother), finding her evidence potentially relevant to support the petitioner's version, but dismissed the petition regarding other witnesses—including senior police officials and an expert—as the petitioner failed to demonstrate their specific relevance and necessity to the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts