Arivuselvi vs Sathuramesh — 2564/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 277(ii). Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 23rd March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSV190049102025

Case disposed

Filing Number

4910/2025

Filing Date

08-10-2025

Registration No

2564/2025

Registration Date

08-10-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi

Judge

5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Partially Allowed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 277(ii)

Petitioner(s)

Arivuselvi

Adv. RAJARAM.S

Respondent(s)

Sathuramesh

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi

23-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Orders

17-02-2026

Enquiry

12-02-2026

Enquiry

02-02-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
IA order

The Judicial Magistrate of Karaikudi partially allowed Arivuselvi's petition under Section 254(2) of Cr.P.C to examine additional witnesses in her private complaint against Inspector Sathu Ramesh, who allegedly used disrespectful language and fabricated documents portraying her father as insane. The court permitted examination of only the second proposed witness (the petitioner's mother), finding her evidence potentially relevant to support the petitioner's version, but dismissed the petition regarding other witnesses—including senior police officials and an expert—as the petitioner failed to demonstrate their specific relevance and necessity to the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate of Karaikudi partially allowed Arivuselvi's petition under Section 254(2) of Cr.P.C to examine additional witnesses in her private complaint against Inspector Sathu Ramesh, who allegedly used disrespectful language and fabricated documents portraying her father as insane. The court permitted examination of only the second proposed witness (the petitioner's mother), finding her evidence potentially relevant to support the petitioner's version, but dismissed the petition regarding other witnesses—including senior police officials and an expert—as the petitioner failed to demonstrate their specific relevance and necessity to the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case