SI of Police Kundrakudi PS vs Saravanan — 1410/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304(A)IPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV190035892022
Next Hearing
12th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1795/2022
Filing Date
20-01-2022
Registration No
1410/2022
Registration Date
20-01-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
FIR Details
FIR Number
15
Police Station
Kundrakudi Police Station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI of Police Kundrakudi PS (Police Station)
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Saravanan
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 25-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a deposition of witness (PW.4) in Criminal Case No. 1410/2022 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi, recorded on 28.04.2026. The witness, Ramasivam (age 35), testified regarding an incident on 01.02.2020 where his father sustained injuries including bleeding from ears/nose and a tractor-related injury to his chest, allegedly caused by accused Saravanam. During cross-examination, the witness contradicted his initial statement, admitting he did not provide specific details about injury locations and that the police wrote the complaint, not him, raising questions about the reliability of his testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a deposition of witness (PW.4) in Criminal Case No. 1410/2022 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi, recorded on 28.04.2026. The witness, Ramasivam (age 35), testified regarding an incident on 01.02.2020 where his father sustained injuries including bleeding from ears/nose and a tractor-related injury to his chest, allegedly caused by accused Saravanam. During cross-examination, the witness contradicted his initial statement, admitting he did not provide specific details about injury locations and that the police wrote the complaint, not him, raising questions about the reliability of his testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts