SI of Polcie Sakkottai PS vs Arun and 5 others — 813/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,294(b),363,323,324,506(2). Status: Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV190023992022
Next Hearing
21st July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1200/2022
Filing Date
15-03-2018
Registration No
813/2022
Registration Date
15-03-2018
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
FIR Details
FIR Number
217
Police Station
Sakkottai Police Station
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI of Polcie Sakkottai PS (Police Station)
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Arun and 5 others
Sekar alias Veerassekar
Pandi alias Pandiyarajan
Babu alis Somasundaram
Karthi alias Dharmadurai
Manoj
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Appearance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant | |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-01-2026 | Appearance |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition (not a court judgment or order) in Criminal Case No. 813/2022 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi. The witness (P.W.1) testified on 27.11.2025 regarding an alleged assault incident from 18.07.2017, detailing accusations against multiple accused persons of beatings, death threats, and kidnapping. The witness admitted during cross-examination that he had settled the dispute with the accused and was providing false testimony, which he acknowledged in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition (not a court judgment or order) in Criminal Case No. 813/2022 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi. The witness (P.W.1) testified on 27.11.2025 regarding an alleged assault incident from 18.07.2017, detailing accusations against multiple accused persons of beatings, death threats, and kidnapping. The witness admitted during cross-examination that he had settled the dispute with the accused and was providing false testimony, which he acknowledged in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts