SI of Police Karaikudi North PS vs Kumar Advocate - V.Vijaya — 611/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392. Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 17th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV190019952022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
998/2022
Filing Date
10-03-2017
Registration No
611/2022
Registration Date
10-03-2017
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Conviction
FIR Details
FIR Number
524
Police Station
Karaikudi North Police Station
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI of Police Karaikudi North PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Kumar Advocate - V.Vijaya
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 03-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court in Karaikudi convicted Kumar under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code (robbery) for snatching a gold thali chain (eight sovereigns) from the complainant on September 10, 2016, near Periyar Statue. The court found the prosecution's case proven beyond reasonable doubt based on the complainant's eyewitness testimony, recovery of the stolen gold chain following the accused's voluntary confession, and corroborating witness evidence. The accused was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for two years and six months, plus a fine of Rs. 5,000 (or three months simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court in Karaikudi convicted Kumar under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code (robbery) for snatching a gold thali chain (eight sovereigns) from the complainant on September 10, 2016, near Periyar Statue. The court found the prosecution's case proven beyond reasonable doubt based on the complainant's eyewitness testimony, recovery of the stolen gold chain following the accused's voluntary confession, and corroborating witness evidence. The accused was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for two years and six months, plus a fine of Rs. 5,000 (or three months simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts