SI of Police Karaikudi North PS vs Lakshmanan — 589/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,447,427,294(b)323,506(I)IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV190019512022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
976/2022
Filing Date
20-02-2017
Registration No
589/2022
Registration Date
20-02-2017
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
273
Police Station
Karaikudi North Police Station
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI of Police Karaikudi North PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Lakshmanan
Velu
Muventhar
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 25-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi acquitted accused persons No. 7 and 10 of all charges under IPC sections 147, 427, 323, 506(1) and Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the principal witnesses (complainant and victim) turned hostile during trial, contradicting their original statements and entering into a compromise with the accused, while no corroborating independent evidence was available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi acquitted accused persons No. 7 and 10 of all charges under IPC sections 147, 427, 323, 506(1) and Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the principal witnesses (complainant and victim) turned hostile during trial, contradicting their original statements and entering into a compromise with the accused, while no corroborating independent evidence was available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts