SI of Police Somanathapuram Ps vs Yasin Advocate - Padmanaban — 519/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,304(A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV190018112022
Next Hearing
25th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
906/2022
Filing Date
10-10-2016
Registration No
519/2022
Registration Date
10-10-2016
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
FIR Details
FIR Number
51
Police Station
Somanathapuram PS
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI of Police Somanathapuram Ps (Police Station)
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Yasin Advocate - Padmanaban
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a deposition of witness (P.W.7) in Criminal Case No. 519/2022 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi, recorded on 16.09.2025. The witness, an assistant doctor, provided detailed post-mortem examination findings of an injury victim, documenting multiple external injuries (lacerations on various body parts) and internal injuries (bleeding in brain membranes, heart sac, lungs, and intestines), concluding the injuries were consistent with blunt force trauma. The testimony was recorded, cross-examined by both prosecution and defense, and confirmed as accurate by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a deposition of witness (P.W.7) in Criminal Case No. 519/2022 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi, recorded on 16.09.2025. The witness, an assistant doctor, provided detailed post-mortem examination findings of an injury victim, documenting multiple external injuries (lacerations on various body parts) and internal injuries (bleeding in brain membranes, heart sac, lungs, and intestines), concluding the injuries were consistent with blunt force trauma. The testimony was recorded, cross-examined by both prosecution and defense, and confirmed as accurate by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts