SIP Karaikudi Crime vs Rajagopal and 1 another Advocate - L.Balasubramanian — 236/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV190012472022
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
624/2022
Filing Date
05-01-2015
Registration No
236/2022
Registration Date
05-01-2015
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SIP (Sub-Inspector of Police) Karaikudi Crime
Adv. APP Gr.I
Respondent(s)
Rajagopal and 1 another Advocate - L.Balasubramanian
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a deposition of witness (P.W.5) in Criminal Case No. 236/2022 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi, recorded on 13.10.2025. The witness, a special investigation officer, testified regarding an FIR filed under Section 392 IPC based on a complaint of theft of 2.5 sovereigns of gold, and during cross-examination, the defense challenged the adequacy of identifying details of the accused and stolen property in the complaint. The witness's testimony and cross-examination statements were recorded and digitally signed by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a deposition of witness (P.W.5) in Criminal Case No. 236/2022 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi, recorded on 13.10.2025. The witness, a special investigation officer, testified regarding an FIR filed under Section 392 IPC based on a complaint of theft of 2.5 sovereigns of gold, and during cross-examination, the defense challenged the adequacy of identifying details of the accused and stolen property in the complaint. The witness's testimony and cross-examination statements were recorded and digitally signed by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts