Inspector of Police Kallal P.S vs Pethuraj — 230/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305(a). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSV190005222026

Filing Number

522/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

230/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi

Judge

5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

264

Police Station

Kallal Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police Kallal P.S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pethuraj

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    IA orderView PDF

    Case 230/2026 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (Accused No. 2) in a temple bell theft case (Crime No. 264/2025 under Section 303(2) BNS). Although Pethuraj was implicated based primarily on the first accused's confession statement with no strong independent evidence, the court found continued detention unjustified given the investigation's near-completion. The court released him on bail with stringent conditions including a Rs. 1 lakh bond, daily police reporting at 10 a.m. and 5 p.m., restrictions on absconding, witness tampering, and jurisdiction departure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 230/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 230/2026 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (Accused No. 2) in a temple bell theft case (Crime No. 264/2025 under Section 303(2) BNS). Although Pethuraj was implicated based primarily on the first accused's confession statement with no strong independent evidence, the court found continued detention unjustified given the investigation's near-completion. The court released him on bail with stringent conditions including a Rs. 1 lakh bond, daily police reporting at 10 a.m. and 5 p.m., restrictions on absconding, witness tampering, and jurisdiction departure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case