Inspector of Police Kallal P.S vs Pethuraj — 229/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(3),331(4),305(a). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV190005212026
Filing Number
521/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
229/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
263
Police Station
Kallal Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police Kallal P.S
Respondent(s)
Pethuraj
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Disposed
Enquiry
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 13-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 12-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 11-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.229 of 2026 The Judicial Magistrate Court in Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (Accused No. 2) in a temple bell theft case (Crime No.263/2025). Though Pethuraj was implicated based solely on the confession statement of the primary accused with no strong independent corroborating evidence, and investigation was substantially complete, the court found continued detention unwarranted. The court released him on bail with stringent conditions including Rs. 1 lakh bond with two sureties, twice-daily police reporting, non-absconding clause, witness non-tampering provisions, and jurisdiction restriction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.229 of 2026 The Judicial Magistrate Court in Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (Accused No. 2) in a temple bell theft case (Crime No.263/2025). Though Pethuraj was implicated based solely on the confession statement of the primary accused with no strong independent corroborating evidence, and investigation was substantially complete, the court found continued detention unwarranted. The court released him on bail with stringent conditions including Rs. 1 lakh bond with two sureties, twice-daily police reporting, non-absconding clause, witness non-tampering provisions, and jurisdiction restriction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts