Inspector of Police Kallal P.S vs Pethuraj — 229/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(3),331(4),305(a). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV190005212026
Filing Number
521/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
229/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
263
Police Station
Kallal Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police Kallal P.S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pethuraj
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
IA orderView PDF
Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.229 of 2026 The Judicial Magistrate Court in Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (Accused No. 2) in a temple bell theft case (Crime No.263/2025). Though Pethuraj was implicated based solely on the confession statement of the primary accused with no strong independent corroborating evidence, and investigation was substantially complete, the court found continued detention unwarranted. The court released him on bail with stringent conditions including Rs. 1 lakh bond with two sureties, twice-daily police reporting, non-absconding clause, witness non-tampering provisions, and jurisdiction restriction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
-
17-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
-
13-Mar-2026
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
-
12-Mar-2026
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 229/2026
Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.229 of 2026 The Judicial Magistrate Court in Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (Accused No. 2) in a temple bell theft case (Crime No.263/2025). Though Pethuraj was implicated based solely on the confession statement of the primary accused with no strong independent corroborating evidence, and investigation was substantially complete, the court found continued detention unwarranted. The court released him on bail with stringent conditions including Rs. 1 lakh bond with two sureties, twice-daily police reporting, non-absconding clause, witness non-tampering provisions, and jurisdiction restriction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts