Inspector of Police Kallal P.S vs Pethuraj — 229/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(3),331(4),305(a). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSV190005212026

Case disposed

Filing Number

521/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

229/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi

Judge

5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

263

Police Station

Kallal Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(3),331(4),305(a)

Petitioner(s)

Inspector of Police Kallal P.S

Respondent(s)

Pethuraj

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi

23-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

Enquiry

13-03-2026

Appearance

12-03-2026

Appearance

11-03-2026

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
IA order

Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.229 of 2026 The Judicial Magistrate Court in Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (Accused No. 2) in a temple bell theft case (Crime No.263/2025). Though Pethuraj was implicated based solely on the confession statement of the primary accused with no strong independent corroborating evidence, and investigation was substantially complete, the court found continued detention unwarranted. The court released him on bail with stringent conditions including Rs. 1 lakh bond with two sureties, twice-daily police reporting, non-absconding clause, witness non-tampering provisions, and jurisdiction restriction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.229 of 2026 The Judicial Magistrate Court in Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (Accused No. 2) in a temple bell theft case (Crime No.263/2025). Though Pethuraj was implicated based solely on the confession statement of the primary accused with no strong independent corroborating evidence, and investigation was substantially complete, the court found continued detention unwarranted. The court released him on bail with stringent conditions including Rs. 1 lakh bond with two sureties, twice-daily police reporting, non-absconding clause, witness non-tampering provisions, and jurisdiction restriction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case