Inspector of Police Kallal P.S vs Pethuraj — 227/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSV190005192026

Case disposed

Filing Number

519/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

227/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi

Judge

5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

260

Police Station

Kallal Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2)

Petitioner(s)

Inspector of Police Kallal P.S

Respondent(s)

Pethuraj

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi

23-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

Enquiry

13-03-2026

Appearance

12-03-2026

Appearance

11-03-2026

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
IA order

Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.227 of 2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (Accused No.2) in a temple bell theft case (Crime No.260/2025 under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita). The court found that Pethuraj's implication relied primarily on co-accused's confession with no strong independent evidence, and since investigation was substantially complete, continued detention was unwarranted. Conditions: Bail bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties, daily police reporting (10 AM & 5 PM), non-absconding, no witness interference, jurisdiction restriction, and residence/mobile disclosure required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.227 of 2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (Accused No.2) in a temple bell theft case (Crime No.260/2025 under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita). The court found that Pethuraj's implication relied primarily on co-accused's confession with no strong independent evidence, and since investigation was substantially complete, continued detention was unwarranted. Conditions: Bail bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties, daily police reporting (10 AM & 5 PM), non-absconding, no witness interference, jurisdiction restriction, and residence/mobile disclosure required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case