Inspector of Police Kallal P.S vs Pethuraj — 227/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV190005192026
Filing Number
519/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
227/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
260
Police Station
Kallal Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police Kallal P.S
Respondent(s)
Pethuraj
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Disposed
Enquiry
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 13-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 12-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 11-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.227 of 2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (Accused No.2) in a temple bell theft case (Crime No.260/2025 under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita). The court found that Pethuraj's implication relied primarily on co-accused's confession with no strong independent evidence, and since investigation was substantially complete, continued detention was unwarranted. Conditions: Bail bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties, daily police reporting (10 AM & 5 PM), non-absconding, no witness interference, jurisdiction restriction, and residence/mobile disclosure required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.227 of 2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (Accused No.2) in a temple bell theft case (Crime No.260/2025 under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita). The court found that Pethuraj's implication relied primarily on co-accused's confession with no strong independent evidence, and since investigation was substantially complete, continued detention was unwarranted. Conditions: Bail bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties, daily police reporting (10 AM & 5 PM), non-absconding, no witness interference, jurisdiction restriction, and residence/mobile disclosure required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts