Inspector of Police Kallal P.S vs Pethuraj — 226/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(3),331(4),305(a). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV190005182026
Filing Number
518/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
226/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
225
Police Station
Kallal Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police Kallal P.S
Respondent(s)
Pethuraj
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Disposed
Enquiry
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 13-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 12-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 11-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Case 226/2026 The Judicial Magistrate of Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj, the second accused in a temple bell theft case (Crime No. 225/2025), finding insufficient independent evidence against him beyond a co-accused's confession statement. The court determined that continued detention was unwarranted given the near-completion of investigation and imposed stringent bail conditions including a Rs. 1,00,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting, and restrictions on absconding, tampering with evidence, and leaving jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Case 226/2026 The Judicial Magistrate of Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj, the second accused in a temple bell theft case (Crime No. 225/2025), finding insufficient independent evidence against him beyond a co-accused's confession statement. The court determined that continued detention was unwarranted given the near-completion of investigation and imposed stringent bail conditions including a Rs. 1,00,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting, and restrictions on absconding, tampering with evidence, and leaving jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts