Inspector of Police Kallal P.S vs Pethuraj — 225/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV190005172026
Filing Number
517/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
225/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
259
Police Station
Kallal Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police Kallal P.S
Respondent(s)
Pethuraj
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Disposed
Enquiry
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 13-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 12-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 11-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Crl.M.P. 225/2026 The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (accused no. 2) in a temple bell theft case (Cr. No. 259/2025). Though implicated primarily on the confession of the first accused under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the court found no strong independent evidence connecting him and noted investigation was substantially complete. The court balanced the serious nature of allegations against his personal liberty and ordered release on Rs. 1 lakh bail with stringent conditions including daily police reporting, non-interference with investigation, and travel restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl.M.P. 225/2026 The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (accused no. 2) in a temple bell theft case (Cr. No. 259/2025). Though implicated primarily on the confession of the first accused under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the court found no strong independent evidence connecting him and noted investigation was substantially complete. The court balanced the serious nature of allegations against his personal liberty and ordered release on Rs. 1 lakh bail with stringent conditions including daily police reporting, non-interference with investigation, and travel restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts